Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Learn Intuition Behind Epsilon-DP and (Epsilon, Delta)-DP | Foundations of Data Privacy
Data Privacy and Differential Privacy Fundamentals

bookIntuition Behind Epsilon-DP and (Epsilon, Delta)-DP

Understanding the intuition behind the privacy parameters epsilon (Ξ΅) and delta (Ξ΄) is essential for grasping the guarantees provided by differential privacy. The parameter epsilon (Ξ΅) is often called the privacy loss parameter. It quantifies the maximum change in the probability of any output when a single individual's data is either included or excluded from a dataset. A smaller Ξ΅ means that the presence or absence of any one person has little effect on the output, providing stronger privacy. Conversely, a larger Ξ΅ allows for greater influence of any individual's data, resulting in weaker privacy guarantees.

Delta (Ξ΄) comes into play in the more general (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-differential privacy definition. While Ξ΅ controls the direct privacy loss, Ξ΄ represents the probability of failureβ€”the chance that the privacy guarantee could be violated by more than Ξ΅. In practice, Ξ΄ is chosen to be a very small number, such as 10⁻⁢ or less, ensuring that the chance of a significant privacy breach is negligible. Together, (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-DP allows for a tiny probability of a larger privacy loss, making certain mechanisms practical while still keeping risk very low.

1234567891011121314151617181920212223
import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt def simulate_dp_output(epsilon, n_simulations=10000): # Simulate two probabilities: with and without a person p_without = 0.5 p_with = np.minimum(np.exp(epsilon) * p_without, 1.0) outputs_without = np.random.binomial(1, p_without, n_simulations) outputs_with = np.random.binomial(1, p_with, n_simulations) return outputs_without, outputs_with epsilons = [0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0] plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6)) for epsilon in epsilons: out_wo, out_w = simulate_dp_output(epsilon) diff = np.abs(np.mean(out_wo) - np.mean(out_w)) plt.bar(str(epsilon), diff, label=f"Ξ΅={epsilon}") plt.ylabel("Difference in Output Probability") plt.xlabel("Epsilon Value") plt.title("Effect of Epsilon on Output Probability Difference") plt.show()
copy

1. Which statement best describes the interpretation of epsilon (Ξ΅) in differential privacy?

2. What is the role of delta (Ξ΄) in (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-differential privacy?

question mark

Which statement best describes the interpretation of epsilon (Ξ΅) in differential privacy?

Select the correct answer

question mark

What is the role of delta (Ξ΄) in (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-differential privacy?

Select the correct answer

Everything was clear?

How can we improve it?

Thanks for your feedback!

SectionΒ 1. ChapterΒ 4

Ask AI

expand

Ask AI

ChatGPT

Ask anything or try one of the suggested questions to begin our chat

Suggested prompts:

Can you explain how the code demonstrates the effect of epsilon on privacy?

What would happen if we used a much larger or smaller value for delta?

Can you provide a real-world example where choosing epsilon and delta is important?

bookIntuition Behind Epsilon-DP and (Epsilon, Delta)-DP

Swipe to show menu

Understanding the intuition behind the privacy parameters epsilon (Ξ΅) and delta (Ξ΄) is essential for grasping the guarantees provided by differential privacy. The parameter epsilon (Ξ΅) is often called the privacy loss parameter. It quantifies the maximum change in the probability of any output when a single individual's data is either included or excluded from a dataset. A smaller Ξ΅ means that the presence or absence of any one person has little effect on the output, providing stronger privacy. Conversely, a larger Ξ΅ allows for greater influence of any individual's data, resulting in weaker privacy guarantees.

Delta (Ξ΄) comes into play in the more general (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-differential privacy definition. While Ξ΅ controls the direct privacy loss, Ξ΄ represents the probability of failureβ€”the chance that the privacy guarantee could be violated by more than Ξ΅. In practice, Ξ΄ is chosen to be a very small number, such as 10⁻⁢ or less, ensuring that the chance of a significant privacy breach is negligible. Together, (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-DP allows for a tiny probability of a larger privacy loss, making certain mechanisms practical while still keeping risk very low.

1234567891011121314151617181920212223
import numpy as np import matplotlib.pyplot as plt def simulate_dp_output(epsilon, n_simulations=10000): # Simulate two probabilities: with and without a person p_without = 0.5 p_with = np.minimum(np.exp(epsilon) * p_without, 1.0) outputs_without = np.random.binomial(1, p_without, n_simulations) outputs_with = np.random.binomial(1, p_with, n_simulations) return outputs_without, outputs_with epsilons = [0.01, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0] plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6)) for epsilon in epsilons: out_wo, out_w = simulate_dp_output(epsilon) diff = np.abs(np.mean(out_wo) - np.mean(out_w)) plt.bar(str(epsilon), diff, label=f"Ξ΅={epsilon}") plt.ylabel("Difference in Output Probability") plt.xlabel("Epsilon Value") plt.title("Effect of Epsilon on Output Probability Difference") plt.show()
copy

1. Which statement best describes the interpretation of epsilon (Ξ΅) in differential privacy?

2. What is the role of delta (Ξ΄) in (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-differential privacy?

question mark

Which statement best describes the interpretation of epsilon (Ξ΅) in differential privacy?

Select the correct answer

question mark

What is the role of delta (Ξ΄) in (Ξ΅, Ξ΄)-differential privacy?

Select the correct answer

Everything was clear?

How can we improve it?

Thanks for your feedback!

SectionΒ 1. ChapterΒ 4
some-alt