Implicit vs Explicit Regularization
In machine learning, understanding the distinction between explicit regularization and implicit bias is fundamental for interpreting how models generalize to unseen data. You have already seen that implicit bias refers to the tendency of learning algorithms to prefer certain solutions over others, even when there are many possible solutions that fit the training data equally well. This preference is not introduced by a specific, manually added term in the loss function but emerges from the dynamics of the optimization algorithm, the model architecture, or the data itself.
Explicit regularization, on the other hand, involves deliberately adding terms or constraints to the learning objective to control model complexity or to favor certain types of solutions. These are intentional modifications, such as adding an L2 penalty (ridge regression) or dropout in neural networks, which directly alter the optimization problem to prevent overfitting or induce sparsity.
The key difference is that explicit regularization is an external intervention in the training process, while implicit bias is an internal property of the algorithm and model combination β even in the absence of any added regularization term. Implicit bias can steer the solution toward those with specific properties (like minimum norm or maximum margin) simply due to the way learning is performed.
Explicit regularization modifies the learning objective by adding explicit terms or constraints to control model complexity, while implicit bias arises from the inherent properties of the optimization algorithm, model, and data, shaping the solution even without any added regularization.
Training a linear regression model with an added L2 penalty term (ridge regression), where the optimizer is standard gradient descent. Here, the model's tendency to prefer smaller weights comes directly from the explicit penalty in the loss function.
Fitting an overparameterized linear model (more parameters than data points) with plain gradient descent and no regularization terms. The optimizer still finds a unique minimum-norm solution due to the implicit bias of the algorithm, even though no explicit regularization was added.
Training a deep neural network with dropout (explicit regularization) using stochastic gradient descent (SGD), which itself has an implicit bias toward certain types of solutions. The final model reflects both the effects of the dropout and the optimization dynamics of SGD.
Thanks for your feedback!
Ask AI
Ask AI
Ask anything or try one of the suggested questions to begin our chat
Awesome!
Completion rate improved to 11.11Implicit vs Explicit Regularization
Swipe to show menu
In machine learning, understanding the distinction between explicit regularization and implicit bias is fundamental for interpreting how models generalize to unseen data. You have already seen that implicit bias refers to the tendency of learning algorithms to prefer certain solutions over others, even when there are many possible solutions that fit the training data equally well. This preference is not introduced by a specific, manually added term in the loss function but emerges from the dynamics of the optimization algorithm, the model architecture, or the data itself.
Explicit regularization, on the other hand, involves deliberately adding terms or constraints to the learning objective to control model complexity or to favor certain types of solutions. These are intentional modifications, such as adding an L2 penalty (ridge regression) or dropout in neural networks, which directly alter the optimization problem to prevent overfitting or induce sparsity.
The key difference is that explicit regularization is an external intervention in the training process, while implicit bias is an internal property of the algorithm and model combination β even in the absence of any added regularization term. Implicit bias can steer the solution toward those with specific properties (like minimum norm or maximum margin) simply due to the way learning is performed.
Explicit regularization modifies the learning objective by adding explicit terms or constraints to control model complexity, while implicit bias arises from the inherent properties of the optimization algorithm, model, and data, shaping the solution even without any added regularization.
Training a linear regression model with an added L2 penalty term (ridge regression), where the optimizer is standard gradient descent. Here, the model's tendency to prefer smaller weights comes directly from the explicit penalty in the loss function.
Fitting an overparameterized linear model (more parameters than data points) with plain gradient descent and no regularization terms. The optimizer still finds a unique minimum-norm solution due to the implicit bias of the algorithm, even though no explicit regularization was added.
Training a deep neural network with dropout (explicit regularization) using stochastic gradient descent (SGD), which itself has an implicit bias toward certain types of solutions. The final model reflects both the effects of the dropout and the optimization dynamics of SGD.
Thanks for your feedback!
