Stopping Rules
Knowing when to stop an experiment is a critical aspect of trustworthy A/B testing. Stopping rules are the guidelines you set before running your experiment that dictate when you will analyze and potentially end the test. These rules help you avoid drawing invalid conclusions due to random fluctuations in your data.
There are two primary types of stopping rules:
-
Fixed-sample stopping rule: Decide in advance how many samples or how much time you will collect data before looking at the results. For example, you might plan to stop collecting data after 10,000 users have participated or after four weeks, whichever comes first. This approach is straightforward and helps protect against bias introduced by repeatedly checking the results.
-
Sequential approaches: Allow for monitoring the data at multiple points during the experiment. With sequential rules, you might check the results every day or week and have pre-defined criteria for stopping early if the evidence is strong enough. However, sequential monitoring requires careful statistical adjustments to maintain the validity of your conclusions, as frequent peeking increases the risk of false positives.
Peeking at results before your pre-defined stopping point—or stopping the experiment early based on interim results—can dramatically increase the risk of Type I errors (false positives). This practice, known as "peeking," can lead you to believe you have found a significant effect when it is actually due to random chance. To avoid these risks, always set and adhere to your stopping rules before starting data collection. For further reading, see discussions on alpha spending and sequential analysis in statistical literature.
Danke für Ihr Feedback!
Fragen Sie AI
Fragen Sie AI
Fragen Sie alles oder probieren Sie eine der vorgeschlagenen Fragen, um unser Gespräch zu beginnen
Can you explain the pros and cons of fixed-sample vs. sequential stopping rules?
What are some common mistakes people make with stopping rules in A/B testing?
How do I choose the right stopping rule for my experiment?
Awesome!
Completion rate improved to 3.23Stopping Rules
Swipe um das Menü anzuzeigen
Knowing when to stop an experiment is a critical aspect of trustworthy A/B testing. Stopping rules are the guidelines you set before running your experiment that dictate when you will analyze and potentially end the test. These rules help you avoid drawing invalid conclusions due to random fluctuations in your data.
There are two primary types of stopping rules:
-
Fixed-sample stopping rule: Decide in advance how many samples or how much time you will collect data before looking at the results. For example, you might plan to stop collecting data after 10,000 users have participated or after four weeks, whichever comes first. This approach is straightforward and helps protect against bias introduced by repeatedly checking the results.
-
Sequential approaches: Allow for monitoring the data at multiple points during the experiment. With sequential rules, you might check the results every day or week and have pre-defined criteria for stopping early if the evidence is strong enough. However, sequential monitoring requires careful statistical adjustments to maintain the validity of your conclusions, as frequent peeking increases the risk of false positives.
Peeking at results before your pre-defined stopping point—or stopping the experiment early based on interim results—can dramatically increase the risk of Type I errors (false positives). This practice, known as "peeking," can lead you to believe you have found a significant effect when it is actually due to random chance. To avoid these risks, always set and adhere to your stopping rules before starting data collection. For further reading, see discussions on alpha spending and sequential analysis in statistical literature.
Danke für Ihr Feedback!
