Serverless vs VM Cost Tradeoffs
When you design cloud architectures, one of the most impactful decisions you will make is whether to use a serverless model or rely on traditional virtual machines (VMs). Understanding the pricing mechanics of each approach is essential for cost optimization.
- Pay only for actual usage: charged per execution, duration, and memory allocated.
- No costs when code is not running; no charges for idle capacity.
- Infrastructure management handled by the cloud provider.
- Pay for provisioned resources (CPU, memory, storage) regardless of usage.
- Charged for total uptime, even if resources are underutilized.
- Must provision for peak usage, which can lead to higher costs for sporadic or unpredictable workloads.
Serverless (AWS Lambda) Cost Breakdown
- Requests: 1,000,000/month;
- Duration per request: 0.5 seconds;
- Memory: 512MB;
- Total compute: 1,000,000 x 0.5s = 500,000 seconds;
- GB-seconds: 500,000 seconds x 0.5GB = 250,000 GB-seconds.
AWS Lambda Pricing:
- $0.20 per 1M requests = $0.20;
- $0.00001667 per GB-second;
- Compute cost: 250,000 x $0.00001667 = $4.17.
Total monthly cost: $0.20 + $4.17 = $4.37.
VM (AWS t3.small EC2 Instance) Cost Breakdown
- Instance: t3.small (2 vCPU, 2GB RAM);
- On-demand price: ~$0.023 per hour;
- Monthly uptime: 24 x 30 = 720 hours;
- Monthly cost: 720 x $0.023 = $16.56.
Total monthly cost: $16.56.
When deciding between serverless and VM-based architectures, consider your workload patterns.
- Serverless is most cost-effective for workloads with variable, unpredictable, or low-to-moderate traffic, where you do not need to provision for peak capacity and can benefit from per-request billing;
- It is also ideal for event-driven applications, infrequent batch jobs, and APIs with spiky or seasonal demand;
- VM-based models are better suited for steady, predictable workloads that require consistent performance, long-running processes, or specialized hardware.
Choose serverless for flexibility and cost savings in unpredictable environments, and choose VMs for stability and control in consistent, high-usage scenarios.
Kiitos palautteestasi!
Kysy tekoälyä
Kysy tekoälyä
Kysy mitä tahansa tai kokeile jotakin ehdotetuista kysymyksistä aloittaaksesi keskustelumme
Mahtavaa!
Completion arvosana parantunut arvoon 8.33Serverless vs VM Cost Tradeoffs
Pyyhkäise näyttääksesi valikon
When you design cloud architectures, one of the most impactful decisions you will make is whether to use a serverless model or rely on traditional virtual machines (VMs). Understanding the pricing mechanics of each approach is essential for cost optimization.
- Pay only for actual usage: charged per execution, duration, and memory allocated.
- No costs when code is not running; no charges for idle capacity.
- Infrastructure management handled by the cloud provider.
- Pay for provisioned resources (CPU, memory, storage) regardless of usage.
- Charged for total uptime, even if resources are underutilized.
- Must provision for peak usage, which can lead to higher costs for sporadic or unpredictable workloads.
Serverless (AWS Lambda) Cost Breakdown
- Requests: 1,000,000/month;
- Duration per request: 0.5 seconds;
- Memory: 512MB;
- Total compute: 1,000,000 x 0.5s = 500,000 seconds;
- GB-seconds: 500,000 seconds x 0.5GB = 250,000 GB-seconds.
AWS Lambda Pricing:
- $0.20 per 1M requests = $0.20;
- $0.00001667 per GB-second;
- Compute cost: 250,000 x $0.00001667 = $4.17.
Total monthly cost: $0.20 + $4.17 = $4.37.
VM (AWS t3.small EC2 Instance) Cost Breakdown
- Instance: t3.small (2 vCPU, 2GB RAM);
- On-demand price: ~$0.023 per hour;
- Monthly uptime: 24 x 30 = 720 hours;
- Monthly cost: 720 x $0.023 = $16.56.
Total monthly cost: $16.56.
When deciding between serverless and VM-based architectures, consider your workload patterns.
- Serverless is most cost-effective for workloads with variable, unpredictable, or low-to-moderate traffic, where you do not need to provision for peak capacity and can benefit from per-request billing;
- It is also ideal for event-driven applications, infrequent batch jobs, and APIs with spiky or seasonal demand;
- VM-based models are better suited for steady, predictable workloads that require consistent performance, long-running processes, or specialized hardware.
Choose serverless for flexibility and cost savings in unpredictable environments, and choose VMs for stability and control in consistent, high-usage scenarios.
Kiitos palautteestasi!
