Modern Perspectives: Beyond Classical Bounds
As machine learning has advanced, new phenomena have emerged that challenge the classical understanding of generalization. One of the most striking is overparameterization: modern neural networks often have far more parameters than training data points, yet they can still generalize well to unseen data. According to traditional theory, such high-capacity models should overfit catastrophically, but in practice, they often do not.
Another surprising observation is the double descent curve. Classical theory predicts that as model complexity increases, test error should decrease until it reaches a minimum and then increase again due to overfitting. However, in many modern models, test error decreases, then increases at the interpolation threshold (where the model can perfectly fit the training data), but then decreases again as the complexity continues to grow. This double descent behavior is not explained by classical generalization bounds, which typically assume that more complex models always risk more overfitting.
These phenomena reveal that classical generalization theory, built on concepts like VC dimension and uniform convergence, may not fully capture the realities of modern machine learning. As a result, researchers are re-examining the foundations of what it means for a model to generalize, and what factors truly control generalization in highly overparameterized settings.
- Why do highly overparameterized models, such as deep neural networks, often generalize well despite having the capacity to fit random noise;
- What mechanisms underlie the double descent phenomenon, and how can new theoretical frameworks capture this behavior;
- How do optimization algorithms, like stochastic gradient descent, bias the solutions found in ways that promote generalization;
- Can new complexity measures or data-dependent analyses provide tighter or more accurate generalization guarantees for modern models.
- Practitioners should be cautious about relying solely on classical bounds to predict generalization performance in modern settings;
- Empirical validation and cross-validation remain critical tools for assessing model performance, especially with large or flexible models;
- Researchers are encouraged to explore alternative metrics and new theoretical tools when working with deep or overparameterized architectures;
- Understanding the limitations of classical theory can inform better model selection, regularization strategies, and risk assessment in practice.
Merci pour vos commentaires !
Demandez à l'IA
Demandez à l'IA
Posez n'importe quelle question ou essayez l'une des questions suggérées pour commencer notre discussion
Génial!
Completion taux amélioré à 11.11Modern Perspectives: Beyond Classical Bounds
Glissez pour afficher le menu
As machine learning has advanced, new phenomena have emerged that challenge the classical understanding of generalization. One of the most striking is overparameterization: modern neural networks often have far more parameters than training data points, yet they can still generalize well to unseen data. According to traditional theory, such high-capacity models should overfit catastrophically, but in practice, they often do not.
Another surprising observation is the double descent curve. Classical theory predicts that as model complexity increases, test error should decrease until it reaches a minimum and then increase again due to overfitting. However, in many modern models, test error decreases, then increases at the interpolation threshold (where the model can perfectly fit the training data), but then decreases again as the complexity continues to grow. This double descent behavior is not explained by classical generalization bounds, which typically assume that more complex models always risk more overfitting.
These phenomena reveal that classical generalization theory, built on concepts like VC dimension and uniform convergence, may not fully capture the realities of modern machine learning. As a result, researchers are re-examining the foundations of what it means for a model to generalize, and what factors truly control generalization in highly overparameterized settings.
- Why do highly overparameterized models, such as deep neural networks, often generalize well despite having the capacity to fit random noise;
- What mechanisms underlie the double descent phenomenon, and how can new theoretical frameworks capture this behavior;
- How do optimization algorithms, like stochastic gradient descent, bias the solutions found in ways that promote generalization;
- Can new complexity measures or data-dependent analyses provide tighter or more accurate generalization guarantees for modern models.
- Practitioners should be cautious about relying solely on classical bounds to predict generalization performance in modern settings;
- Empirical validation and cross-validation remain critical tools for assessing model performance, especially with large or flexible models;
- Researchers are encouraged to explore alternative metrics and new theoretical tools when working with deep or overparameterized architectures;
- Understanding the limitations of classical theory can inform better model selection, regularization strategies, and risk assessment in practice.
Merci pour vos commentaires !
