Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Impara Huber Loss: Combining MSE and MAE | Regression Loss Functions
Understanding Loss Functions in Machine Learning

bookHuber Loss: Combining MSE and MAE

The Huber loss offers a unique blend of the Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), providing both the smoothness of MSEMSE and the robustness of MAEMAE. The formula for the Huber loss is defined piecewise, allowing it to switch between a quadratic and a linear penalty depending on the size of the prediction error. The Huber loss for a single prediction is given by:

Lδ(y,y^)={12(yy^)2if yy^δδ(yy^12δ)otherwiseL_\delta(y, \hat{y}) = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}(y - \hat{y})^2 & \text{if } |y - \hat{y}| \leq \delta \\ \delta \cdot (|y - \hat{y}| - \frac{1}{2}\delta) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}

Here, yy is the true value, y^\hat{y} is the predicted value, and δ\delta is a positive threshold parameter.

Note
Note

Huber loss behaves like MSEMSE for small errors, promoting smooth optimization and sensitivity to small deviations. For large errors, it switches to MAEMAE behavior, reducing the influence of outliers and providing robustness. This balance makes Huber loss especially useful in datasets with occasional large errors or outliers.

The transition parameter δ\delta is central to how the Huber loss functions. When the absolute error is less than or equal to δ\delta, the loss is quadratic, just like MSE. This means small errors are penalized more strongly, encouraging precise predictions. When the error exceeds δ\delta, the loss becomes linear, similar to MAE, which prevents large errors from having an outsized impact on the optimization process. By tuning δ\delta, you can control the trade-off between sensitivity to small errors and robustness to outliers. A smaller δ\delta makes the loss function more like MAE, while a larger δ\delta makes it more like MSE.

question mark

Which of the following statements best describes the advantages of Huber loss and when it is preferred over MSE or MAE?

Select the correct answer

Tutto è chiaro?

Come possiamo migliorarlo?

Grazie per i tuoi commenti!

Sezione 2. Capitolo 3

Chieda ad AI

expand

Chieda ad AI

ChatGPT

Chieda pure quello che desidera o provi una delle domande suggerite per iniziare la nostra conversazione

Awesome!

Completion rate improved to 6.67

bookHuber Loss: Combining MSE and MAE

Scorri per mostrare il menu

The Huber loss offers a unique blend of the Mean Squared Error (MSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE), providing both the smoothness of MSEMSE and the robustness of MAEMAE. The formula for the Huber loss is defined piecewise, allowing it to switch between a quadratic and a linear penalty depending on the size of the prediction error. The Huber loss for a single prediction is given by:

Lδ(y,y^)={12(yy^)2if yy^δδ(yy^12δ)otherwiseL_\delta(y, \hat{y}) = \begin{cases} \frac{1}{2}(y - \hat{y})^2 & \text{if } |y - \hat{y}| \leq \delta \\ \delta \cdot (|y - \hat{y}| - \frac{1}{2}\delta) & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}

Here, yy is the true value, y^\hat{y} is the predicted value, and δ\delta is a positive threshold parameter.

Note
Note

Huber loss behaves like MSEMSE for small errors, promoting smooth optimization and sensitivity to small deviations. For large errors, it switches to MAEMAE behavior, reducing the influence of outliers and providing robustness. This balance makes Huber loss especially useful in datasets with occasional large errors or outliers.

The transition parameter δ\delta is central to how the Huber loss functions. When the absolute error is less than or equal to δ\delta, the loss is quadratic, just like MSE. This means small errors are penalized more strongly, encouraging precise predictions. When the error exceeds δ\delta, the loss becomes linear, similar to MAE, which prevents large errors from having an outsized impact on the optimization process. By tuning δ\delta, you can control the trade-off between sensitivity to small errors and robustness to outliers. A smaller δ\delta makes the loss function more like MAE, while a larger δ\delta makes it more like MSE.

question mark

Which of the following statements best describes the advantages of Huber loss and when it is preferred over MSE or MAE?

Select the correct answer

Tutto è chiaro?

Come possiamo migliorarlo?

Grazie per i tuoi commenti!

Sezione 2. Capitolo 3
some-alt