Lære Comparing Rules, Trees, and Linear Models | Rule-Based Models in Practice

When working with tabular data, you often must choose between different model types, each with distinct strengths and weaknesses. Rule-based models (such as rule lists or sets), decision trees, and linear models (like logistic or linear regression) are among the most popular choices.

Rule-based models excel in providing highly interpretable logic, usually in the form of "if-then" statements. This makes them easy for humans to follow, validate, and modify. However, they may struggle with capturing complex relationships unless many rules are used, which can reduce their simplicity.

Decision trees are also interpretable, as their structure can be visualized and traversed as a sequence of decisions. Trees can capture interactions between features, but they may become deep and unwieldy, which makes them harder to interpret. Pruning can help, but may reduce accuracy.

Linear models are simple and efficient, particularly for problems where relationships between features and outcomes are approximately linear. They provide coefficients that indicate the direction and strength of each feature's effect. However, they cannot naturally handle feature interactions or non-linear relationships unless additional feature engineering is performed.

In summary:

Rule-based models: very interpretable, good for domain knowledge, may miss complex patterns;
Decision trees: interpretable up to a certain depth, can model interactions, prone to overfitting if not pruned;
Linear models: highly efficient and robust, but limited to linear relationships unless extended.


              1234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344
            
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.datasets import load_breast_cancer
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.tree import DecisionTreeClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.metrics import accuracy_score
from sklearn.base import BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin

# Simple rule-based classifier for demonstration
class SimpleRuleBasedClassifier(BaseEstimator, ClassifierMixin):
    def fit(self, X, y):
        # For demo: learn mean of a feature for each class
        self.idx = X.columns.get_loc('mean radius')
        self.threshold = X['mean radius'].mean()
        return self
    def predict(self, X):
        # Rule: if mean radius > threshold, predict 0, else 1
        return (X.iloc[:, self.idx] <= self.threshold).astype(int)

# Load dataset and prepare
data = load_breast_cancer(as_frame=True)
X = data['data']
y = data['target']
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(X, y, random_state=42)

# Train rule-based model
rule_model = SimpleRuleBasedClassifier()
rule_model.fit(X_train, y_train)
rule_preds = rule_model.predict(X_test)

# Train decision tree
tree = DecisionTreeClassifier(max_depth=3, random_state=42)
tree.fit(X_train, y_train)
tree_preds = tree.predict(X_test)

# Train linear model
logreg = LogisticRegression(max_iter=5000, random_state=42)
logreg.fit(X_train, y_train)
logreg_preds = logreg.predict(X_test)

# Compare outputs
print("Rule-based accuracy:", accuracy_score(y_test, rule_preds))
print("Decision tree accuracy:", accuracy_score(y_test, tree_preds))
print("Linear model accuracy:", accuracy_score(y_test, logreg_preds))

Looking at the code above, you see three models applied to the same breast cancer dataset. The rule-based model uses a single rule based on the mean radius feature, providing a clear and simple decision boundary, though it is likely to miss more nuanced patterns. The decision tree (with controlled depth) can capture some feature interactions, offering a balance between interpretability and accuracy. The linear model (logistic regression) leverages all features but assumes a linear relationship, which might not fully capture the complexities of the data.

In practice, interpretability is highest for rule-based models with a small number of rules, followed by shallow decision trees, and then linear models (whose coefficients are interpretable but less intuitive than rules). Accuracy may be higher for trees or linear models if the data contains complex or linear patterns, respectively. The best choice depends on your priorities: if you need maximum transparency and simple logic, rules are ideal; if you need to capture more interactions and can tolerate some complexity, trees are suitable; for speed and robustness with mostly linear effects, linear models work well.

1. When is it most appropriate to use a rule-based model over a decision tree or a linear model for tabular data?

2. Which statement best describes the difference in interpretability among rule-based models, decision trees, and linear models?

Alt var klart?

Takk for tilbakemeldingene dine!

Seksjon 2. Kapittel 5

Spør AI

Spør om hva du vil, eller prøv ett av de foreslåtte spørsmålene for å starte chatten vår

Suggested prompts:

Can you explain why the rule-based model performed worse than the other models?

How would increasing the complexity of the decision tree affect interpretability and accuracy?

What are some ways to improve the performance of the rule-based model?

Awesome!

Completion rate improved to 6.25

Sveip for å vise menyen