Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Lære Fixed vs. Variable Length Character Types | Deep Dive: Numeric and Character Types
SQL Data Types Explained

bookFixed vs. Variable Length Character Types

When you need to store text in SQL, you often choose between two main character types: fixed-length (CHAR) and variable-length (VARCHAR). Understanding the difference between these types is key to designing efficient databases. Imagine a row of mailboxes in an apartment building: each mailbox is the same size, even if some residents only receive postcards and others get large letters. This is like CHAR—every entry takes up the same amount of space, no matter how much is actually used. On the other hand, VARCHAR is like a set of flexible boxes that expand or shrink to fit the amount of mail each resident gets. With VARCHAR, storage adjusts to the length of the actual data, which can save space for entries that are shorter.

CREATE TABLE places (
    country_code CHAR(2),
    city_name VARCHAR(50)
);

Choosing between CHAR and VARCHAR depends on how predictable your data length is. In the places table above, the country_code column uses CHAR(2) because country codes are always two characters long, like "US" or "FR". This makes CHAR ideal: storage is simple and performance can be slightly faster for fixed-length values, since the database knows exactly how much space to allocate. The city_name column, however, uses VARCHAR(50) because city names vary greatly in length, from "Oslo" to "San Francisco". Using VARCHAR here avoids wasting space on short names while still accommodating longer ones. If you used CHAR(50) for city names, every entry would take up 50 characters, even if the actual name was much shorter, leading to wasted storage.

INSERT INTO places (country_code, city_name) VALUES
('US', 'New York'),
('FR', 'Paris'),
('JP', 'Osaka');

1. Which type is more efficient for storing short, fixed-length codes?

2. What is a potential drawback of using CHAR for variable-length data?

question mark

Which type is more efficient for storing short, fixed-length codes?

Select the correct answer

question mark

What is a potential drawback of using CHAR for variable-length data?

Select the correct answer

Alt var klart?

Hvordan kan vi forbedre det?

Takk for tilbakemeldingene dine!

Seksjon 2. Kapittel 3

Spør AI

expand

Spør AI

ChatGPT

Spør om hva du vil, eller prøv ett av de foreslåtte spørsmålene for å starte chatten vår

Suggested prompts:

Can you explain more about when to use CHAR vs VARCHAR in other scenarios?

What are the performance implications of using CHAR and VARCHAR?

Are there any limitations or caveats with using VARCHAR for very large text?

bookFixed vs. Variable Length Character Types

Sveip for å vise menyen

When you need to store text in SQL, you often choose between two main character types: fixed-length (CHAR) and variable-length (VARCHAR). Understanding the difference between these types is key to designing efficient databases. Imagine a row of mailboxes in an apartment building: each mailbox is the same size, even if some residents only receive postcards and others get large letters. This is like CHAR—every entry takes up the same amount of space, no matter how much is actually used. On the other hand, VARCHAR is like a set of flexible boxes that expand or shrink to fit the amount of mail each resident gets. With VARCHAR, storage adjusts to the length of the actual data, which can save space for entries that are shorter.

CREATE TABLE places (
    country_code CHAR(2),
    city_name VARCHAR(50)
);

Choosing between CHAR and VARCHAR depends on how predictable your data length is. In the places table above, the country_code column uses CHAR(2) because country codes are always two characters long, like "US" or "FR". This makes CHAR ideal: storage is simple and performance can be slightly faster for fixed-length values, since the database knows exactly how much space to allocate. The city_name column, however, uses VARCHAR(50) because city names vary greatly in length, from "Oslo" to "San Francisco". Using VARCHAR here avoids wasting space on short names while still accommodating longer ones. If you used CHAR(50) for city names, every entry would take up 50 characters, even if the actual name was much shorter, leading to wasted storage.

INSERT INTO places (country_code, city_name) VALUES
('US', 'New York'),
('FR', 'Paris'),
('JP', 'Osaka');

1. Which type is more efficient for storing short, fixed-length codes?

2. What is a potential drawback of using CHAR for variable-length data?

question mark

Which type is more efficient for storing short, fixed-length codes?

Select the correct answer

question mark

What is a potential drawback of using CHAR for variable-length data?

Select the correct answer

Alt var klart?

Hvordan kan vi forbedre det?

Takk for tilbakemeldingene dine!

Seksjon 2. Kapittel 3
some-alt