Transfer, Modularity, and Internal Representations
Transfer learning is a core concept in understanding how large language models (LLMs) generalize knowledge from one task to another. In LLMs, internal representations — patterns of activations and weights distributed across the model — capture abstract features of language, concepts, and reasoning patterns. When you prompt an LLM with a new task, it draws on these representations to respond, even if the task was not seen during training. The effectiveness of transfer depends on how much the new task overlaps with what the model has previously learned. If the internal representations encode generalizable language structures or reasoning strategies, the model can apply them to unfamiliar scenarios. However, if the representations are too specialized or fragmented, transfer may be limited, leading to poor performance on tasks outside the training distribution.
Modularity refers to the idea that a model's internal architecture or learned representations might organize into semi-independent subsystems or "modules," each specializing in different skills or domains. For example, one part of the model might become more attuned to grammar, while another focuses on arithmetic or factual recall.
Researchers analyze the activations and connectivity patterns within LLMs to look for evidence of modular structure. Techniques include probing specific neurons, ablating parts of the network, or examining how information flows during different tasks.
In theory, modularity could allow models to isolate and reuse relevant knowledge for new tasks, supporting more robust transfer. However, in practice, LLMs often develop "implicit" modularity — where specialization exists but is not sharply separated. This can both help and hinder transfer, depending on how well the relevant modules are activated by new prompts.
Unlike biological brains, LLMs do not have explicit anatomical modules. Their modularity, if present, emerges from the training process and data. This implicit modularity may be less flexible or interpretable, and sometimes leads to interference between tasks.
Transfer in LLMs is most effective when different tasks share overlapping latent structures in their internal representations. While modularity can, in principle, facilitate this process, in practice, LLMs tend to develop implicit, rather than explicit, modular organization.
Tack för dina kommentarer!
Fråga AI
Fråga AI
Fråga vad du vill eller prova någon av de föreslagna frågorna för att starta vårt samtal
Fantastiskt!
Completion betyg förbättrat till 11.11Transfer, Modularity, and Internal Representations
Svep för att visa menyn
Transfer learning is a core concept in understanding how large language models (LLMs) generalize knowledge from one task to another. In LLMs, internal representations — patterns of activations and weights distributed across the model — capture abstract features of language, concepts, and reasoning patterns. When you prompt an LLM with a new task, it draws on these representations to respond, even if the task was not seen during training. The effectiveness of transfer depends on how much the new task overlaps with what the model has previously learned. If the internal representations encode generalizable language structures or reasoning strategies, the model can apply them to unfamiliar scenarios. However, if the representations are too specialized or fragmented, transfer may be limited, leading to poor performance on tasks outside the training distribution.
Modularity refers to the idea that a model's internal architecture or learned representations might organize into semi-independent subsystems or "modules," each specializing in different skills or domains. For example, one part of the model might become more attuned to grammar, while another focuses on arithmetic or factual recall.
Researchers analyze the activations and connectivity patterns within LLMs to look for evidence of modular structure. Techniques include probing specific neurons, ablating parts of the network, or examining how information flows during different tasks.
In theory, modularity could allow models to isolate and reuse relevant knowledge for new tasks, supporting more robust transfer. However, in practice, LLMs often develop "implicit" modularity — where specialization exists but is not sharply separated. This can both help and hinder transfer, depending on how well the relevant modules are activated by new prompts.
Unlike biological brains, LLMs do not have explicit anatomical modules. Their modularity, if present, emerges from the training process and data. This implicit modularity may be less flexible or interpretable, and sometimes leads to interference between tasks.
Transfer in LLMs is most effective when different tasks share overlapping latent structures in their internal representations. While modularity can, in principle, facilitate this process, in practice, LLMs tend to develop implicit, rather than explicit, modular organization.
Tack för dina kommentarer!
