Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Lära Implications for Feature Engineering | The Curse of Dimensionality
Geometry of High-Dimensional Data

bookImplications for Feature Engineering

When you consider feature engineering in high-dimensional spaces, it is tempting to believe that adding more features will always improve your model. However, the curse of dimensionality reveals that this intuition can be misleading. As you increase the number of features, the data becomes increasingly sparse in the feature space. This sparsity means that data points are farther apart, and the density of points in any given region drops quickly. With each new feature, the volume of the space grows exponentially, but your dataset size usually stays the same, making it much less likely for points to be close to each other.

This sparsity leads to the phenomenon known as the vanishing middle. In high dimensions, most of the volume is concentrated near the edges of the space, and very little is in the center. As a result, the concept of similarity between points becomes less meaningful, and models may struggle to generalize. Adding features that are not highly informative can therefore worsen model performance, as the model may overfit to noise or irrelevant patterns in the data. This is why, despite the availability of more features, careful selection and dimensionality reduction techniques often become necessary to maintain model effectiveness.

When features are highly informative and independent
expand arrow

If you add genuinely new, relevant, and independent features, they can provide additional signal that improves model performance, even in high dimensions;

When using regularization or feature selection
expand arrow

Techniques such as L1/L2 regularization or embedded feature selection can help manage the risk of overfitting, allowing you to safely include more features;

When the dataset is extremely large
expand arrow

If you have a dataset with a very high number of samples, the effects of sparsity are reduced, and adding features may still be beneficial;

When features capture different aspects of the data
expand arrow

Features that describe truly distinct facets of the underlying phenomenon may contribute positively, especially if they are not redundant.

question mark

Which of the following best describes the main trade-off when increasing the number of features in your model?

Select the correct answer

Var allt tydligt?

Hur kan vi förbättra det?

Tack för dina kommentarer!

Avsnitt 2. Kapitel 4

Fråga AI

expand

Fråga AI

ChatGPT

Fråga vad du vill eller prova någon av de föreslagna frågorna för att starta vårt samtal

bookImplications for Feature Engineering

Svep för att visa menyn

When you consider feature engineering in high-dimensional spaces, it is tempting to believe that adding more features will always improve your model. However, the curse of dimensionality reveals that this intuition can be misleading. As you increase the number of features, the data becomes increasingly sparse in the feature space. This sparsity means that data points are farther apart, and the density of points in any given region drops quickly. With each new feature, the volume of the space grows exponentially, but your dataset size usually stays the same, making it much less likely for points to be close to each other.

This sparsity leads to the phenomenon known as the vanishing middle. In high dimensions, most of the volume is concentrated near the edges of the space, and very little is in the center. As a result, the concept of similarity between points becomes less meaningful, and models may struggle to generalize. Adding features that are not highly informative can therefore worsen model performance, as the model may overfit to noise or irrelevant patterns in the data. This is why, despite the availability of more features, careful selection and dimensionality reduction techniques often become necessary to maintain model effectiveness.

When features are highly informative and independent
expand arrow

If you add genuinely new, relevant, and independent features, they can provide additional signal that improves model performance, even in high dimensions;

When using regularization or feature selection
expand arrow

Techniques such as L1/L2 regularization or embedded feature selection can help manage the risk of overfitting, allowing you to safely include more features;

When the dataset is extremely large
expand arrow

If you have a dataset with a very high number of samples, the effects of sparsity are reduced, and adding features may still be beneficial;

When features capture different aspects of the data
expand arrow

Features that describe truly distinct facets of the underlying phenomenon may contribute positively, especially if they are not redundant.

question mark

Which of the following best describes the main trade-off when increasing the number of features in your model?

Select the correct answer

Var allt tydligt?

Hur kan vi förbättra det?

Tack för dina kommentarer!

Avsnitt 2. Kapitel 4
some-alt