Mutexes and Locks
Mutual exclusion is a fundamental concept in concurrent programming that ensures only one thread accesses a shared resource at a time. In C++, the std::mutex class provides a way to enforce this rule. When multiple threads attempt to read or modify shared data simultaneously, their actions can overlap in unpredictable ways, leading to bugs known as race conditions. By using a mutex, you can create a region in your code where only one thread is allowed to execute at a time, protecting your shared resources from concurrent access issues.
main.cpp
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031#include <iostream> #include <thread> #include <mutex> #include <vector> std::mutex counter_mutex; int counter = 0; void increment_counter(int times) { for (int i = 0; i < times; ++i) { std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(counter_mutex); ++counter; } } int main() { const int num_threads = 4; const int increments_per_thread = 100000; std::vector<std::thread> threads; for (int i = 0; i < num_threads; ++i) threads.emplace_back(increment_counter, increments_per_thread); for (auto& t : threads) t.join(); std::cout << "Final counter value: " << counter << std::endl; }
In this example, you use a std::mutex named counter_mutex to guard access to the shared counter variable. Each thread attempts to increment the counter many times, but only one thread may enter the critical section—the code between acquiring and releasing the mutex—at a time. This prevents race conditions and ensures that the final value of counter is correct.
Critical section refers to a part of a program where shared resources are accessed or modified. If multiple threads enter a critical section simultaneously without protection, race conditions can occur, leading to incorrect or unpredictable results. Mutexes are synchronization primitives that prevent race conditions by ensuring only one thread can enter the critical section at any moment.
When using mutexes, you need a convenient and reliable way to acquire and release them. C++ offers two main RAII-based locking mechanisms for this: std::lock_guard and std::unique_lock. Both are designed to lock a mutex when created and automatically release it when destroyed, but they differ in features and use cases.
- Simple, lightweight wrapper for locking a mutex;
- Locks the mutex upon construction and unlocks upon destruction;
- Cannot be unlocked before the end of its scope;
- Minimal overhead; best for straightforward, scope-based locking.
- More flexible than lock_guard;
- Can be locked and unlocked multiple times within its scope;
- Supports deferred locking and timed locking;
- Slightly more overhead; suitable for complex locking scenarios or when lock ownership needs to be transferred.
Choosing between std::lock_guard and std::unique_lock depends on your requirements. If you only need to lock a mutex for a simple scope, std::lock_guard is ideal. If you need to lock and unlock multiple times or require advanced features, std::unique_lock is the better choice.
Дякуємо за ваш відгук!
Запитати АІ
Запитати АІ
Запитайте про що завгодно або спробуйте одне із запропонованих запитань, щоб почати наш чат
Can you explain the difference between std::lock_guard and std::unique_lock in more detail?
What are some common mistakes to avoid when using mutexes in C++?
Can you provide an example of using std::unique_lock with advanced features?
Awesome!
Completion rate improved to 7.69
Mutexes and Locks
Свайпніть щоб показати меню
Mutual exclusion is a fundamental concept in concurrent programming that ensures only one thread accesses a shared resource at a time. In C++, the std::mutex class provides a way to enforce this rule. When multiple threads attempt to read or modify shared data simultaneously, their actions can overlap in unpredictable ways, leading to bugs known as race conditions. By using a mutex, you can create a region in your code where only one thread is allowed to execute at a time, protecting your shared resources from concurrent access issues.
main.cpp
12345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031#include <iostream> #include <thread> #include <mutex> #include <vector> std::mutex counter_mutex; int counter = 0; void increment_counter(int times) { for (int i = 0; i < times; ++i) { std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(counter_mutex); ++counter; } } int main() { const int num_threads = 4; const int increments_per_thread = 100000; std::vector<std::thread> threads; for (int i = 0; i < num_threads; ++i) threads.emplace_back(increment_counter, increments_per_thread); for (auto& t : threads) t.join(); std::cout << "Final counter value: " << counter << std::endl; }
In this example, you use a std::mutex named counter_mutex to guard access to the shared counter variable. Each thread attempts to increment the counter many times, but only one thread may enter the critical section—the code between acquiring and releasing the mutex—at a time. This prevents race conditions and ensures that the final value of counter is correct.
Critical section refers to a part of a program where shared resources are accessed or modified. If multiple threads enter a critical section simultaneously without protection, race conditions can occur, leading to incorrect or unpredictable results. Mutexes are synchronization primitives that prevent race conditions by ensuring only one thread can enter the critical section at any moment.
When using mutexes, you need a convenient and reliable way to acquire and release them. C++ offers two main RAII-based locking mechanisms for this: std::lock_guard and std::unique_lock. Both are designed to lock a mutex when created and automatically release it when destroyed, but they differ in features and use cases.
- Simple, lightweight wrapper for locking a mutex;
- Locks the mutex upon construction and unlocks upon destruction;
- Cannot be unlocked before the end of its scope;
- Minimal overhead; best for straightforward, scope-based locking.
- More flexible than lock_guard;
- Can be locked and unlocked multiple times within its scope;
- Supports deferred locking and timed locking;
- Slightly more overhead; suitable for complex locking scenarios or when lock ownership needs to be transferred.
Choosing between std::lock_guard and std::unique_lock depends on your requirements. If you only need to lock a mutex for a simple scope, std::lock_guard is ideal. If you need to lock and unlock multiple times or require advanced features, std::unique_lock is the better choice.
Дякуємо за ваш відгук!