Notice: This page requires JavaScript to function properly.
Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings or update your browser.
Segmentation and Aggregation | Encapsulation Overview
C++ OOP

Segmentation and AggregationSegmentation and Aggregation

When you are creating software that is maintainable and flexible, there is a lot to things to consider in process, especially in object-oriented programming. Composition and aggregation are fundamental concepts that enable the creation of complex systems from simpler components and are parts of encapsulation paradigm.

Composition

Composition is a design technique where a class contains objects of other classes as member variables. These members are vital components of the containing class and have a strong ownership relationship. When the containing object is destroyed, its composed parts are also destroyed. For example:

h

Car.h

h

Engine.h

The Car class composes an Engine object. When a Car object is created, it automatically creates an Engine instance as a part of its composition.

Aggregation

Aggregation is another form of object composition where a class contains object of other classes, but the contained instances have a weaker relationship compared to composition. In aggregation, the contained member classes can exist independently and may be shared among multiple classes.

h

Car.h

h

Engine.h

In this example, the Car class aggregates an Engine object using a pointer. The Car class does not own the Engine object; it merely holds a reference to it. This allows the Engine instance to exist independently of the Car object and be shared among multiple instances if necessary.

Choosing Between Composition and Aggregation

When designing software systems, it's essential to carefully consider whether to use composition or aggregation based on the relationships between classes and objects.

Situation
Composition
Aggregation
Containing class must take ownership of contained objects
Yes
No
Contained objects are integral parts of the containing class
Yes
No
Containing class merely references the contained objects
No
Yes
Contained objects can exist independently or be shared among multiple instances
No
Yes

In the context of a Car and its Engine classes, using composition would be more appropriate. Each car typically has its own engine, and the engine is an integral part of the car itself. Additionally, it prevents the Engine from being shared or reused across multiple car objects, which is also makes sense.

1. What is the primary difference between composition and aggregation?
2. In composition, what happens to the part class when the whole class is destroyed?

What is the primary difference between composition and aggregation?

Select the correct answer

In composition, what happens to the part class when the whole class is destroyed?

Select the correct answer

Everything was clear?

Section 3. Chapter 6

Segmentation and AggregationSegmentation and Aggregation

When you are creating software that is maintainable and flexible, there is a lot to things to consider in process, especially in object-oriented programming. Composition and aggregation are fundamental concepts that enable the creation of complex systems from simpler components and are parts of encapsulation paradigm.

Composition

Composition is a design technique where a class contains objects of other classes as member variables. These members are vital components of the containing class and have a strong ownership relationship. When the containing object is destroyed, its composed parts are also destroyed. For example:

h

Car.h

h

Engine.h

The Car class composes an Engine object. When a Car object is created, it automatically creates an Engine instance as a part of its composition.

Aggregation

Aggregation is another form of object composition where a class contains object of other classes, but the contained instances have a weaker relationship compared to composition. In aggregation, the contained member classes can exist independently and may be shared among multiple classes.

h

Car.h

h

Engine.h

In this example, the Car class aggregates an Engine object using a pointer. The Car class does not own the Engine object; it merely holds a reference to it. This allows the Engine instance to exist independently of the Car object and be shared among multiple instances if necessary.

Choosing Between Composition and Aggregation

When designing software systems, it's essential to carefully consider whether to use composition or aggregation based on the relationships between classes and objects.

Situation
Composition
Aggregation
Containing class must take ownership of contained objects
Yes
No
Contained objects are integral parts of the containing class
Yes
No
Containing class merely references the contained objects
No
Yes
Contained objects can exist independently or be shared among multiple instances
No
Yes

In the context of a Car and its Engine classes, using composition would be more appropriate. Each car typically has its own engine, and the engine is an integral part of the car itself. Additionally, it prevents the Engine from being shared or reused across multiple car objects, which is also makes sense.

1. What is the primary difference between composition and aggregation?
2. In composition, what happens to the part class when the whole class is destroyed?

What is the primary difference between composition and aggregation?

Select the correct answer

In composition, what happens to the part class when the whole class is destroyed?

Select the correct answer

Everything was clear?

Section 3. Chapter 6
some-alt